test: payments round-2 — webhook gate/M2 refund, gift-card cancel re-issue, till lock contention, sweep VAT rescue coverage
- webhooks: booking-status gate rejects cancelled bookings, M2 stranded-charge refund row + alert, gift-card rows left pending, payable-booking side-effects, unknown-event 503, refund-before-row 503, webhook-after-sync no-double-complete - giftcards: saved_card_id SCA wire, card_id+token rejected, resume re-issue never over-refunds entitlement, pending-Square-refund blocks, diff re-issue only what is owed - sweep: VAT on split-rescued primary, all-tip rows VAT-free, till status/key-changed-while-locked skip, recordUntrackedTillSalePayment VAT - till: suffixed-key slot scan lock held across Square round-trip Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai> Ultraworked with [Sisyphus](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -423,10 +423,11 @@ func TestHandleSquareWebhook_BodyTooLarge(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
func TestHandleSquareWebhook_ValidSignatureWithEnvKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
// Well-formed payment.updated event carrying the full nested payment object
|
||||
// (data.object.payment with id/status) so handlePaymentUpdated can parse
|
||||
// and dispatch it — a known money event whose payload fails to parse
|
||||
// returns 503 without a dedup row (Square retries), which is NOT this
|
||||
// test's intent. The unique event_id and square_payment_id avoid colliding
|
||||
// with the other tests' dedup rows and payment fixtures.
|
||||
// and dispatch it. The COMPLETED charge matches NO local row — round-8 fix
|
||||
// 3: a genuinely unknown completed payment is retried (503, no dedup row)
|
||||
// rather than acked, so the signature passing is what this test proves (a
|
||||
// bad signature would 403 before dispatch). The unique event_id avoids
|
||||
// colliding with the other tests' dedup rows.
|
||||
body := []byte(fmt.Sprintf(`{"type":"payment.updated","event_id":"evt_envkey_1","created_at":%q,"data":{"object":{"payment":{"id":"sqp_env_key_1","status":"COMPLETED","amount_money":{"amount":5000,"currency":"GBP"},"updated_at":%q}}}}`, nowInRFC3339(0), nowInRFC3339(0)))
|
||||
key := "env-signing-key"
|
||||
notificationURL := "http://localhost:8080/webhooks/square"
|
||||
@@ -439,8 +440,8 @@ func TestHandleSquareWebhook_ValidSignatureWithEnvKey(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
t.Setenv("SQUARE_WEBHOOK_SIGNATURE_KEY", key)
|
||||
|
||||
w := makeWebhookRequest(body, sig, context.Background())
|
||||
if w.Code != http.StatusOK {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected 200 with valid signature, got %d. body: %s", w.Code, w.Body.String())
|
||||
if w.Code != http.StatusServiceUnavailable {
|
||||
t.Errorf("expected 503 for a signed COMPLETED payment.updated with no local row (unresolved unknown money event is retried, not acked), got %d. body: %s", w.Code, w.Body.String())
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -714,6 +715,10 @@ func TestHandleSquareWebhook_ConcurrentSameEvent_Serialized(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
squarePaymentID := fmt.Sprintf("sqp_concurrent_same_%d", seq)
|
||||
eventID := fmt.Sprintf("evt_concurrent_same_%d", seq)
|
||||
payID := createWebhookTestPayment(t, squarePaymentID, "pending")
|
||||
// The webhook's booking gate (round-8) only completes booking-attached
|
||||
// rows — a booking-less row is a gift-card purchase and is left pending
|
||||
// (C6). Attach a payable booking so the gate completes the payment.
|
||||
attachWebhookTestBooking(t, payID, 10.00)
|
||||
|
||||
event := SquareWebhookEvent{
|
||||
Type: "payment.updated",
|
||||
@@ -791,6 +796,9 @@ func TestHandleSquareWebhook_DedupCacheEviction_Redispatches(t *testing.T) {
|
||||
|
||||
const squarePaymentID = "sqp_dedup_eviction"
|
||||
payID := createWebhookTestPayment(t, squarePaymentID, "pending")
|
||||
// The webhook's booking gate (round-8) only completes booking-attached
|
||||
// rows — attach a payable booking so the gate completes the payment.
|
||||
attachWebhookTestBooking(t, payID, 10.00)
|
||||
|
||||
event := SquareWebhookEvent{
|
||||
Type: "payment.updated",
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user