//go:build dev

package square

// KNOWN LIMITATION — THIS MOCK IS IN-MEMORY ONLY. Every ledger map below
// (payments, paymentByKey, paymentSource, cards, cardByToken, checkouts,
// completed, refunds, refundByKey, customers) lives for the lifetime of the
// process and is reset on ANY dev-server restart. There is intentionally NO
// persistence — this is a dev mock, not a store.
//
// Money-state consequence: a keyed pending row that is replayed AFTER a
// restart looks like an UNKNOWN idempotency key to the fresh mock, so the
// replay takes the unknown-key path — a spent/expired cnon: nonce is rejected
// (ErrReplayKeyNotRetained → the sweep DEFINITIVELY fails the row, and a till
// sale's funded gift card is clawed back) where prod would still hold the
// ORIGINAL payment under the retained key and return it. A test that
// "simulates a restart" with a fresh MockClient is therefore exercising the
// prod UNKNOWN-KEY case, NOT the prod retained-key case — do not read such a
// test as evidence of how prod treats a retained key after a restart. If a
// test needs retained-key behaviour, it must re-seed the payment under the key
// into the same mock instance (see TestSweepStalePendingPayments_KeyedLostResponse_CompletedRescued).
//
// FAULT-INJECTION TOGGLES. The mock exposes opt-in toggles (ShouldFail,
// FailRefundCode, ForceCheckoutState, ForceRefundPending, FailCreateCheckout,
// FailAfterCommit, SimulateSourceUsed, ForcePaymentStatus,
// SimulateVerificationRequired, SimulateSavedCardVerificationRequired,
// ChallengeResult) that let dev/tests drive Square failure modes
// that are otherwise only reachable against the real API. FailAfterCommit
// simulates the exact "charged but response lost → same-key retry" prod
// scenario: CreatePayment COMMITS the charge (retaining the key and source in
// the ledgers exactly like a successful charge) and THEN returns a 5xx-style
// error to the caller. A subsequent CreatePayment with the SAME key + SAME
// source dedups to the committed payment, proving no double charge.
// SimulateSourceUsed simulates Square's SOURCE_USED rejection of a card source
// (cnon: nonce) reused after a previous save. ForcePaymentStatus forces
// CreatePayment's payment status while returning nil error — the "Square
// returned 200 with a non-terminal payment" prod scenario, so a status-blind
// handler (records 'completed' on nil error alone) is caught in dev.
// SimulateVerificationRequired mirrors Square's SCA enforcement on
// customer-initiated new-card charges (see the field doc).
//
// REAL-API SAFETY GUARD. A `//go:build dev` build must never silently route to
// the real PRODUCTION Square API on an env-string match alone — a typo'd or
// leftover SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=production in a dev shell would otherwise create
// REAL charges from test bookings. NewDevClient therefore HARD-FAILS (panics
// with errDevRealAPIRequiresOverride) when SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=production
// unless the explicit override SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API=1 is set, and logs a loud
// banner before routing a dev build to the SANDBOX. The non-dev build
// (square.go, `//go:build !dev`) is untouched: NewProdClient always uses the
// real client path selected by the normal non-dev wiring.

import (
	"context"
	"crussell/clock"
	"crypto/sha256"
	"encoding/json"
	"errors"
	"fmt"
	"log"
	"net/http"
	"os"
	"strconv"
	"strings"
	"sync"
	"time"
)

var Client SquareClient

var isTesting = os.Getenv("GO_TESTING") == "1"

func mockSleep(d time.Duration) {
	if !isTesting {
		time.Sleep(d)
	}
}

type MockClient struct {
	mu            sync.RWMutex
	cards         map[string]map[string]*CardOnFile
	cardByToken   map[string]*CardOnFile // ccof: token (CardOnFile.CardID) → the saved card, for replay-by-key rescue
	checkouts     map[string]*CheckoutResult
	payments      map[string]*PaymentResult
	paymentByKey  map[string]*PaymentResult
	paymentSource map[string]string // idempotency key → the source_id the original CreatePayment used
	refunds       map[string]*RefundResult
	refundByKey   map[string]*RefundResult
	customers     map[string]*CustomerResult
	completed     map[string]*PaymentResult
	HoldCheckouts bool
	ShouldFail    bool // if true, CreatePayment/RefundPayment return errors for testing error paths
	// FailRefundCode simulates a specific Square refund rejection code. Empty
	// = normal success; when set, RefundPayment returns the sentinel-wrapped
	// error for that code. The money-in-flight codes Square actually emits —
	// REFUND_ALREADY_PENDING (real) and PAYMENT_ALREADY_REFUNDED (kept for
	// resilience, matching the real client's classification) — map to
	// ErrRefundAlreadyProcessed; any other code maps to ErrRefundDeclined.
	FailRefundCode string
	// ForceCheckoutState forces CreateCheckout's initial status instead of the
	// default "PENDING" (one of "IN_PROGRESS", "CANCEL_REQUESTED", "CANCELED").
	// While set, the auto-complete goroutine is suppressed so the forced state
	// persists — the sweep's intermediate-state paths (isTerminalCheckoutError
	// / isCheckoutDefinitivelyDead) can then be exercised in dev/tests exactly
	// as they run against the real Square API.
	ForceCheckoutState string
	// ForceRefundPending makes RefundPayment return a PENDING refund so the
	// prod-only pending-refund branch (normally only reachable against the
	// real Square API) can be exercised in dev/tests.
	ForceRefundPending bool
	// FailCreateCheckout makes CreateCheckout return an error so the handler's
	// post-insert CreateCheckout-failure path (marking the provisional
	// terminal_checkouts row failed) can be exercised in dev/tests.
	FailCreateCheckout bool
	// FailAfterCommit simulates the exact "charged but response lost → same-key
	// retry" prod scenario: CreatePayment COMMITS the charge internally
	// (retaining the key + source in paymentByKey/paymentSource exactly like a
	// successful charge) and THEN returns a 5xx-style error to the caller. A
	// subsequent CreatePayment with the SAME key + SAME source dedups to the
	// committed payment — never a second charge — exercising the retry path
	// devs hit in prod when Square processes a charge but the response is lost.
	FailAfterCommit bool
	// SimulateSourceUsed enforces Square's single-use source simulation on both
	// endpoints: CreateCardOnFile rejects a card source (cnon: nonce) already
	// used to create a card with the structured 400 SOURCE_USED error real
	// Square's CreateCard API returns, and CreatePayment rejects a cnon nonce
	// already used to create a payment or card with 400 CARD_TOKEN_USED. Off by
	// default — the handler integration suite shares ONE mock instance across
	// parallel tests (testmain_test.go) and reuses "cnon:test-card"-style
	// tokens across requests, so enforcement is enabled only in tests that
	// exercise the reused-source rejection. UsedSources() reports the sources
	// consumed so far.
	SimulateSourceUsed bool
	// usedSources records card sources consumed by CreateCardOnFile while
	// SimulateSourceUsed is enabled (Square consumes a cnon: nonce on card
	// creation, so reusing it is rejected with SOURCE_USED). CreatePayment's
	// single-use nonce simulation shares the same map: with the toggle on, a
	// cnon consumed by either endpoint is rejected on reuse (CARD_TOKEN_USED
	// from CreatePayment, SOURCE_USED from CreateCardOnFile) — exactly like
	// real Square, which consumes a nonce regardless of which endpoint used it.
	usedSources map[string]bool
	// ForcePaymentStatus forces CreatePayment's payment status instead of the
	// default "COMPLETED" (or "APPROVED" for autocomplete=false). When set,
	// CreatePayment returns a payment carrying the forced status with nil
	// error — the "Square returned 200 with a non-terminal payment" prod
	// scenario. It proves a status-blind handler (one that records 'completed'
	// on nil error alone) is a regression: the client surfaces Status
	// faithfully (paymentFromSquare never errors on a non-terminal status —
	// see square_http_client.go), so only the handler's own status check can
	// catch a FAILED/CANCELED/PENDING/APPROVED payment.
	ForcePaymentStatus string
	// SimulateVerificationRequired mirrors Square's SCA enforcement on
	// customer-initiated new-card charges: when true, CreatePayment with a
	// cnon: (new-card nonce) source that carries no VerificationToken is
	// rejected with a structured 400 CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED —
	// the buyer must complete 3DS/SCA verification and re-tokenize, NOT retry
	// the same request (the code is in definitivePaymentCodes). A present
	// verification token (e.g. a verify_mock_... token) satisfies the gate and
	// the charge succeeds. Off by default — existing dev/test flows charge
	// plain "cnon:test-card"-style tokens without verification tokens.
	SimulateVerificationRequired bool
	// SimulateSavedCardVerificationRequired mirrors Square's SCA enforcement on
	// saved-card charges — the SCA-primary saved-card posture the platform uses
	// (buyer verification on card-on-file charges, not just new-card nonces).
	// When true, CreatePayment demands SCA on every saved-card charge, where a
	// charge is a saved-card charge in one of two wire shapes:
	//   (a) a fresh cnon:-style tokenize-result as source_id + customer_id
	//       (Square's CURRENT contract: card.tokenize(verificationDetails,
	//       cardId) returns a one-time token sent as source_id with the card's
	//       customer_id — the token IS the buyer verification, so this shape is
	//       ACCEPTED without any verification_token). ONLY a genuine
	//       tokenize-result (cnon:sca-... — see isSCATokenizeResultSource) is
	//       accepted: a RAW card.tokenize() nonce in the tokenize-result slot
	//       is REJECTED with CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED, mirroring real
	//       Square rejecting an unverified nonce as a card-on-file source
	//       (money-F2 — the handler treats any non-empty new_card_token +
	//       saved-card ref as an SCA tokenize-result, so the mock is the
	//       enforcement point that stops the forged shape);
	//   (b) a legacy ccof: source carrying a verification_token (the deprecated
	//       verifyBuyer() contract — kept accepting for backward-compat).
	// A ccof: source with NEITHER is rejected with the structured 400
	// CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED and a pending buyer-verification
	// challenge is recorded for the card. A subsequent charge WITH a
	// verification token resolves that challenge (see resolveVerificationToken):
	// an explicitly approved challenge, or a stateless
	// verify_mock_<prefix>_<amount>_ok token, lets the charge succeed; a denied
	// challenge / _deny token is rejected with 400 VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID.
	// Cards marked via GrandfatherSavedCard bypass the gate entirely. Off by
	// default — existing dev/test flows charge saved cards without verification
	// tokens, so flipping it on in a prod-like test setup intentionally surfaces
	// every saved-card charge that would be rejected by Square's SCA.
	SimulateSavedCardVerificationRequired bool
	// ChallengeResult configures the mock's SCA challenge outcome when a
	// verification token is supplied on a gated charge. "" or "approve"
	// (default) accepts a valid token / approved challenge; "deny" simulates
	// the buyer denying EVERY banking-app challenge (any token →
	// VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID); "auto" auto-resolves a gate rejection's
	// pending challenge as approved, so the next tokenized retry succeeds
	// without an explicit ApprovePendingVerification call.
	ChallengeResult string
	// grandfatheredCards marks ccof: tokens that are exempt from the saved-card
	// verification gate (GrandfatherSavedCard). An exempt card charges without
	// a verification token even while SimulateSavedCardVerificationRequired is
	// on — mirroring cards Square has already verified / stored with a standing
	// SCA exemption.
	grandfatheredCards map[string]bool
	// pendingChallenges records the per-card buyer-verification challenge state
	// that the saved-card gate creates when it rejects a ccof charge without a
	// token. An opaque (real-Square-shaped) verification token is resolved
	// against this ledger; the deterministic verify_mock_... tokens carry their
	// own outcome and only consult the ledger to honour an explicit denial.
	pendingChallenges map[string]*pendingChallenge
	// verifyTokens is a one-time-use ledger of verify_mock_* verification
	// tokens consumed by a successful charge or a definitive
	// VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID rejection — mirroring real Square, which
	// consumes a verification token on use so a replayed token is rejected
	// (VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID). Mirrors the usedSources ledger pattern.
	verifyTokens map[string]bool
}

type devProdClient struct{}

// pendingChallenge is the recorded buyer-verification challenge state for one
// saved-card (ccof:) token. outcome "" = pending (recorded by the gate's
// rejection, not yet resolved); "approved" / "denied" = resolved via
// ApprovePendingVerification / DenyPendingVerification.
type pendingChallenge struct {
	outcome string
}

func (d *devProdClient) CreatePayment(ctx context.Context, req CreatePaymentReq) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	return createPaymentHTTP(ctx, req)
}
func (d *devProdClient) CreateCheckout(ctx context.Context, req CreateCheckoutReq) (*CheckoutResult, error) {
	return createCheckoutHTTP(ctx, req)
}
func (d *devProdClient) GetCheckout(ctx context.Context, checkoutID string) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	return getCheckoutHTTP(ctx, checkoutID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) GetPayment(ctx context.Context, paymentID string) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	return getPaymentHTTP(ctx, paymentID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) ReplayPaymentByKey(ctx context.Context, snapshotJSON []byte) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	return replayPaymentByKeyHTTP(ctx, snapshotJSON)
}
func (d *devProdClient) CreateCustomer(ctx context.Context, name, email string) (*CustomerResult, error) {
	return createCustomerHTTP(ctx, name, email)
}

func (d *devProdClient) DeleteCustomer(ctx context.Context, customerID string) error {
	return deleteCustomerHTTP(ctx, customerID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) CancelCheckout(ctx context.Context, checkoutID string) error {
	return cancelCheckoutHTTP(ctx, checkoutID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) RefundPayment(ctx context.Context, req RefundPaymentReq) (*RefundResult, error) {
	return refundPaymentHTTP(ctx, req)
}
// PaymentWasRefunded has ZERO production callers — kept only to satisfy the
// SquareClient interface for the dev mock's refund-reconciliation parity
// tests. Production reconciliation uses paymentRefundedExactlyWithClient.
func (d *devProdClient) PaymentWasRefunded(ctx context.Context, paymentID string) (bool, error) {
	return PaymentWasRefunded(ctx, paymentID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) CreateCardOnFile(ctx context.Context, userID, cardToken, customerID string) (*CardOnFile, error) {
	return createCardOnFileHTTP(ctx, userID, cardToken, customerID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) GetCardsOnFile(ctx context.Context, userID string) ([]CardOnFile, error) {
	return getCardsOnFileHTTP(ctx, userID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) DeleteCardOnFile(ctx context.Context, cardID string) error {
	return deleteCardOnFileHTTP(ctx, cardID)
}
func (d *devProdClient) ListPaymentRefunds(ctx context.Context, paymentID string, beginTime time.Time) ([]RefundResult, error) {
	return listRefundsHTTP(ctx, paymentID, beginTime)
}

func NewClient() SquareClient {
	return NewDevClient()
}

// errDevRealAPIRequiresOverride is the hard-fail error NewDevClient panics
// with when a dev build is asked to route to the real PRODUCTION Square API
// without the explicit SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API=1 override. A dev build must
// never silently charge real money on an env-string match alone.
var errDevRealAPIRequiresOverride = errors.New("square: dev build refuses SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=production without SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API=1 (would route to the REAL Square API)")

func NewDevClient() SquareClient {
	env := SquareEnvironment()
	switch env {
	case "production":
		// A `//go:build dev` build routing to the real production API is an
		// explicit safety boundary, not a string-match convenience. Without
		// the override, a typo'd or leftover SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=production in
		// a dev shell would make test bookings create REAL charges and payouts.
		// Fail fast so the misconfiguration is impossible to miss.
		if os.Getenv("SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API") != "1" {
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-PROD] REFUSING to construct the real production Square client in a dev build: SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=production without SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API=1 — set SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API=1 to override, or SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=sandbox/mock for safe dev traffic")
			panic(errDevRealAPIRequiresOverride)
		}
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-PROD] SQUARE_ENVIRONMENT=production WITH SQUARE_ALLOW_REAL_API=1 — dev build making REAL API calls to %s (explicit override, real money)", realBaseURL(env))
		return &devProdClient{}
	case "sandbox":
		// Sandbox never moves real money, so a dev build may route there — but
		// loudly, so no-one mistakes a sandbox for the mock.
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-PROD] *** DEV BUILD ROUTING TO SQUARE SANDBOX %s — test credentials only, NO real charges — this is NOT the mock client ***", realBaseURL(env))
		return &devProdClient{}
	default:
		log.Println("[SQUARE-MOCK] Using in-memory mock client")
		return &MockClient{
			cards:           make(map[string]map[string]*CardOnFile),
			cardByToken:     make(map[string]*CardOnFile),
			checkouts:       make(map[string]*CheckoutResult),
			payments:        make(map[string]*PaymentResult),
			paymentByKey:    make(map[string]*PaymentResult),
			paymentSource:   make(map[string]string),
			refunds:         make(map[string]*RefundResult),
			refundByKey:     make(map[string]*RefundResult),
			customers:       make(map[string]*CustomerResult),
			completed:       make(map[string]*PaymentResult),
			usedSources:     make(map[string]bool),
			grandfatheredCards: make(map[string]bool),
			pendingChallenges:  make(map[string]*pendingChallenge),
			verifyTokens:       make(map[string]bool),
		}
	}
}

func detectCardInfo(sourceID string) (brand, last4 string) {
	switch sourceID {
	case "cnon:test-card":
		return "VISA", "4242"
	case "cnon:visa":
		return "VISA", "1111"
	case "cnon:mastercard":
		return "MASTERCARD", "4444"
	case "cnon:amex":
		return "AMERICAN_EXPRESS", "0005"
	default:
		return "VISA", "4242"
	}
}

// keyReuseError is Square's documented IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED rejection: an
// idempotency key reused with a DIFFERENT request body (real Square compares
// the WHOLE body; the mock checks the source_id, the only body field that
// legitimately varies between same-intent retries). The structured code lets
// ErrorCode(err) read it, and the sweep treats it as ambiguous — a data bug,
// NOT proof the charge never happened. Shared by CreatePayment's dedup and
// ReplayPaymentByKey so both paths return the byte-identical error the real
// API would.
func keyReuseError(key string) error {
	return &squareAPIError{
		Code:       "IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED",
		Detail:     "idempotency key was reused with a different request body",
		StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
		err:        fmt.Errorf("square: idempotency key %s reused with a different source_id", key),
	}
}

// verificationTokenInvalidError is Square's VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID
// rejection (definitivePaymentCodes): the supplied 3DS/SCA verification token
// is invalid, expired, already used, denied by the buyer, or not bound to this
// card + amount. A definitive payment error — retrying the same request can
// never succeed.
func verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID string) error {
	return &squareAPIError{
		Code:       "VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID",
		Category:   "PAYMENT_METHOD_ERROR",
		Detail:     "The verification token is invalid, expired, already used, or not valid for this charge",
		StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
		err:        fmt.Errorf("square: verification token %s is not valid for card-on-file charge on %s", tokenPrefix(token), tokenPrefix(sourceID)),
	}
}

// parsedVerifyToken is the deterministic verify_mock_<prefix>_<amount>[_ok|_deny]
// verification-token encoding shared by the dev frontend and the mock, so the
// two sides can exercise approve/deny outcomes WITHOUT shared state.
type parsedVerifyToken struct {
	prefix string
	amount int64
	denied bool
}

// parseVerifyToken parses a deterministic mock verification token of the form
// verify_mock_<prefix>_<amount>[_ok|_deny] (outcome suffix defaults to ok).
// Returns ok=false for anything that is not parseable (an opaque token — the
// same shape as real Square's verification tokens — which resolves against the
// recorded pending challenge instead).
func parseVerifyToken(token string) (parsedVerifyToken, bool) {
	const marker = "verify_mock_"
	if !strings.HasPrefix(token, marker) {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	rest := strings.TrimPrefix(token, marker)
	if rest == "" {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	parts := strings.Split(rest, "_")
	denied := false
	if n := len(parts); n > 1 {
		switch parts[n-1] {
		case "ok", "deny":
			denied = parts[n-1] == "deny"
			parts = parts[:n-1]
		}
	}
	if len(parts) == 0 {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	amount, err := strconv.ParseInt(parts[len(parts)-1], 10, 64)
	if err != nil {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	return parsedVerifyToken{prefix: strings.Join(parts[:len(parts)-1], "_"), amount: amount, denied: denied}, true
}

// verificationTokenPrefixForSource returns the card prefix the mock binds an
// SCA verification token to for a source_id — the SAME derivation the dev
// frontend uses when minting verify_mock_... tokens, so the binding check
// cannot drift between the two sides. New-card (cnon:) nonces bind to the
// first four digits of the PAN the user typed (MockCardForm MOCK_TOKENS);
// saved-card (ccof:) tokens bind to the first four chars after the ccof:
// prefix (MockCardForm.verifySavedCard).
func verificationTokenPrefixForSource(sourceID string) string {
	switch sourceID {
	case "cnon:test-card":
		return "4242"
	case "cnon:visa":
		return "4111"
	case "cnon:mastercard":
		return "5555"
	case "cnon:amex":
		return "3782"
	}
	if strings.HasPrefix(sourceID, "ccof:") {
		rest := strings.TrimPrefix(sourceID, "ccof:")
		if len(rest) > 4 {
			return rest[:4]
		}
		return rest
	}
	return ""
}

// isSCATokenizeResultSource reports whether a cnon: source represents a GENUINE
// Square tokenizeWithVerification result — the CURRENT saved-card SCA contract's
// charge source (card.tokenize(verificationDetails, cardId)) — rather than a RAW
// card.tokenize() nonce. Real Square returns both as opaque cnon: tokens, so the
// dev mock needs an explicit marker to tell them apart: a genuine tokenize-result
// carries "sca-" immediately after the cnon: prefix (the shape the dev
// frontend's MockCardForm mints for saved-card verification). A raw nonce like
// "cnon:test-card" — whatever customer_id rides along — is NOT a tokenize-result,
// and real Square rejects it as a card-on-file charge source.
func isSCATokenizeResultSource(sourceID string) bool {
	return strings.HasPrefix(sourceID, "cnon:sca-")
}

// parseSCATokenizeResult parses the deterministic mock tokenize-result encoding
// the dev frontend mints for saved-card SCA: cnon:sca-<prefix>_<amount>[_ok|_deny]
// (outcome suffix defaults to ok). The prefix is the first four characters of
// the saved card's ccof: id, the amount is the pence charge the token was bound
// to, and the outcome encodes the buyer's challenge decision
// (MockCardForm.tokenizeSavedCard / verifySavedCard, square.ts's
// tokenizeSavedCardWithVerification mock fallback). Reuses parsedVerifyToken's
// shape — same binding + outcome semantics as the legacy verify_mock_ encoding.
// Returns ok=false for anything that is not parseable (an arbitrary cnon:sca-...
// string — NOT a genuine tokenize-result).
func parseSCATokenizeResult(token string) (parsedVerifyToken, bool) {
	const marker = "cnon:sca-"
	if !strings.HasPrefix(token, marker) {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	rest := strings.TrimPrefix(token, marker)
	if rest == "" {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	parts := strings.Split(rest, "_")
	denied := false
	if n := len(parts); n > 1 {
		switch parts[n-1] {
		case "ok", "deny":
			denied = parts[n-1] == "deny"
			parts = parts[:n-1]
		}
	}
	if len(parts) == 0 {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	amount, err := strconv.ParseInt(parts[len(parts)-1], 10, 64)
	if err != nil {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	prefix := strings.Join(parts[:len(parts)-1], "_")
	if prefix == "" {
		return parsedVerifyToken{}, false
	}
	return parsedVerifyToken{prefix: prefix, amount: amount, denied: denied}, true
}

// tokenizeResultVerificationRequiredError is the refusal for a cnon:sca-
// tokenize-result that does not prove buyer verification for THIS charge — the
// same structured 402 CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED rejection a raw nonce
// in the tokenize-result slot gets. The buyer must re-verify (mint a token bound
// to this card + amount), never retry the same request.
func tokenizeResultVerificationRequiredError(sourceID, reason string) error {
	return &squareAPIError{
		Code:       "CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED",
		Category:   "PAYMENT_METHOD_ERROR",
		Detail:     "tokenize-result token does not prove buyer verification for this charge; complete buyer verification (tokenizeWithVerification) for this card and amount",
		StatusCode: http.StatusPaymentRequired,
		err:        fmt.Errorf("square: tokenize-result source %s is not valid for this saved-card charge (%s)", tokenPrefix(sourceID), reason),
	}
}

// scaTokenizePrefixKnown reports whether the card prefix embedded in a
// cnon:sca- tokenize-result is one the mock can bind the token to: the
// deterministic prefixes the mock assigns to its test cards, the "test" fallback
// the frontend uses for a degenerate ccof id, or the prefix of a saved card in
// the mock's ledger (the ccof: token prefix the frontend derives the minted
// prefix from — square.ts / MockCardForm). A prefix outside this set cannot come
// from a tokenize-result minted for a card this mock knows, so it is a forged or
// wrong-card binding.
func (m *MockClient) scaTokenizePrefixKnown(prefix string) bool {
	if prefix == "test" {
		return true
	}
	switch prefix {
	case "4242", "4111", "5555", "3782":
		return true
	}
	for _, card := range m.cardByToken {
		if verificationTokenPrefixForSource(card.CardID) == prefix {
			return true
		}
	}
	return false
}

// validateSCATokenizeResult validates the deterministic binding the dev frontend
// encodes into a cnon:sca- tokenize-result source against the charge: the
// embedded amount must match the charge amount (Square binds buyer verification
// to the exact amount), the encoded outcome must not be a buyer denial, and the
// embedded card prefix must be one the mock can bind to. An arbitrary
// cnon:sca-... string that does not carry the deterministic encoding is NOT a
// genuine tokenize-result (the frontend always mints the bound shape), so it is
// refused exactly like a raw nonce in the tokenize-result slot. Caller holds
// m.mu; the source is already known to carry the cnon:sca- marker.
func (m *MockClient) validateSCATokenizeResult(sourceID string, amount int64) error {
	parsed, ok := parseSCATokenizeResult(sourceID)
	if !ok {
		return tokenizeResultVerificationRequiredError(sourceID, "does not carry the deterministic tokenize-result binding")
	}
	if parsed.denied {
		return tokenizeResultVerificationRequiredError(sourceID, "the buyer denied the SCA challenge")
	}
	if parsed.amount != amount {
		return tokenizeResultVerificationRequiredError(sourceID, fmt.Sprintf("bound to a different amount (%d vs %d)", parsed.amount, amount))
	}
	if !m.scaTokenizePrefixKnown(parsed.prefix) {
		return tokenizeResultVerificationRequiredError(sourceID, fmt.Sprintf("bound to an unknown card prefix %q", parsed.prefix))
	}
	return nil
}

// isTokenLikeMock is the dev mock's PCI-DSS token predicate: it accepts the
// SAME production token shapes as the real client (cnon: nonces / ccof: card
// ids — isTokenLike). The legacy verify_mock_<prefix>_<amount> source widening
// is REMOVED: the transition to genuine cnon:sca- tokenize-results is complete
// and real Square never accepts verify_mock_ as a source_id, so accepting it in
// the mock would mask a bug that prod would reject. verify_mock_ tokens remain
// valid in the VerificationToken field (the deprecated verifyBuyer() contract) —
// only the source-slot widening is removed.
func isTokenLikeMock(s string) bool {
	return isTokenLike(s)
}

// legacyVerifyMockSourceError is the mock's explicit rejection of the
// deprecated verify_mock_<prefix>_<amount>[_ok|_deny] charge-source shape the
// dev frontend used during the token-shape transition. Real Square never
// accepts verify_mock_ as a source_id (it is not a cnon:/ccof: token), so the
// mock refuses it with a clear "legacy shape not supported" error instead of
// silently accepting it — the old source widening (isTokenLikeMock) masked the
// divergence.
func legacyVerifyMockSourceError(s string) error {
	return fmt.Errorf("square: %s is the legacy verify_mock_ transition shape and is NOT a valid charge source — real Square rejects it; mint a genuine tokenize-result (cnon:sca-<prefix>_<amount>_ok) or use a cnon:/ccof: token", tokenPrefix(s))
}

// resolveVerificationToken validates a supplied 3DS/SCA verification token for
// a charge. savedCard=true resolves against the saved-card challenge ledger;
// savedCard=false (new-card nonce) treats any present token as satisfying the
// gate. Returns nil when the token is accepted (consuming it in the one-time-use
// ledger), or a definitive 400 VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID. Must be called under
// m.mu (CreatePayment holds the write lock).
func (m *MockClient) resolveVerificationToken(token, sourceID string, amount int64, savedCard bool) error {
	isVerifyToken := strings.HasPrefix(token, "verify_mock_")

	// ChallengeResult="deny" simulates the buyer denying every banking-app
	// challenge: ANY token is definitively rejected.
	if m.ChallengeResult == "deny" {
		if isVerifyToken {
			m.verifyTokens[token] = true
		}
		return verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID)
	}

	// One-time-use ledger: a verify_mock_* token is consumed on its first use;
	// a second use of the same token is definitively invalid.
	if isVerifyToken && m.verifyTokens[token] {
		return verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID)
	}

	// Deterministic tokens carry their own binding and outcome.
	if parsed, ok := parseVerifyToken(token); ok {
		if parsed.amount != amount || parsed.prefix != verificationTokenPrefixForSource(sourceID) {
			m.verifyTokens[token] = true
			return verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID)
		}
		if parsed.denied {
			m.verifyTokens[token] = true
			return verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID)
		}
		// Encoded approval. An explicitly DENIED pending challenge is still the
		// authority (shared-state denial overrides the stateless encoding).
		if savedCard {
			if ch := m.pendingChallenges[sourceID]; ch != nil && ch.outcome == "denied" {
				m.verifyTokens[token] = true
				return verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID)
			}
		}
		m.verifyTokens[token] = true
		return nil
	}

	// Opaque token (real-Square-shaped): a new-card charge accepts it (the cnon
	// gate requires only a present token); a saved-card charge resolves it
	// against the recorded pending challenge — a token for a challenge that was
	// never recorded, or that is still pending, is "never seen" → invalid.
	if !savedCard {
		if isVerifyToken {
			m.verifyTokens[token] = true
		}
		return nil
	}
	ch := m.pendingChallenges[sourceID]
	if ch == nil || ch.outcome != "approved" {
		if isVerifyToken {
			m.verifyTokens[token] = true
		}
		return verificationTokenInvalidError(token, sourceID)
	}
	if isVerifyToken {
		m.verifyTokens[token] = true
	}
	return nil
}

// mockPaymentWireBody builds the sqCreatePaymentRequest the dev mock validates
// a CreatePaymentReq against. It is an INDEPENDENTLY assembled copy of the
// client's wire shape (buildCreatePaymentBody, square_http_client.go) so the
// contract test TestCreatePayment_SCA_SavedCard_WireBody_ByteIdentical can
// prove the mock and the real client emit BYTE-IDENTICAL CreatePayment bodies
// for the same charge — a wire drift (like the legacy verification_token +
// ccof: divergence this rebuild replaces) fails that test before reaching prod.
// LocationID defaults to "L_MOCK" (the mock's location), mirroring the client's
// env-defaulted location for a charge that specifies none.
func mockPaymentWireBody(req CreatePaymentReq) sqCreatePaymentRequest {
	body := sqCreatePaymentRequest{
		SourceID:          req.SourceID,
		IdempotencyKey:    req.IdempotencyKey,
		AmountMoney:       sqMoney{Amount: req.Amount, Currency: req.Currency},
		Autocomplete:      req.Autocomplete,
		LocationID:        firstNonEmpty(req.LocationID, "L_MOCK"),
		ReferenceID:       req.ReferenceID,
		CustomerID:        req.CustomerID,
		Note:              req.Note,
		VerificationToken: req.VerificationToken,
		BuyerEmailAddress: req.BuyerEmail,
		CustomerDetails:   req.CustomerDetails,
	}
	if req.TipMoney != nil {
		body.TipMoney = &sqMoney{Amount: *req.TipMoney, Currency: req.Currency}
	}
	return body
}

func (m *MockClient) CreatePayment(ctx context.Context, req CreatePaymentReq) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	if m.ShouldFail {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("mock: payment declined (simulated failure)")
	}
	// Validate the WIRE BODY (not the raw req fields) so the mock accepts
	// exactly the request shape the real client emits — the gates below read
	// body fields, and TestCreatePayment_SCA_SavedCard_WireBody_ByteIdentical
	// pins that body byte-identical to the client's.
	body := mockPaymentWireBody(req)
	// Match the real Square API: source_id must be a token (cnon:xxx nonce or
	// ccof:xxx card ID). Raw PANs are rejected exactly as Square would, so the
	// mock behaves identically to production (PCI-DSS parity). The legacy
	// verify_mock_* transition shape is rejected explicitly — real Square never
	// accepts it as a source_id (isTokenLikeMock).
	if strings.HasPrefix(body.SourceID, "verify_mock_") {
		return nil, legacyVerifyMockSourceError(body.SourceID)
	}
	if !isTokenLikeMock(body.SourceID) {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid source_id: %s — use a card nonce (cnon:xxx) or card ID (ccof:xxx)", tokenPrefix(body.SourceID))
	}
	// Square's CreatePayment requires a positive amount_money — a missing or
	// zero amount is rejected (400 INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR), never treated as a
	// no-op. The mock mirrors the rejection so a caller that tries to charge
	// £0 (e.g. a deposit fully covered by a campaign discount) fails loudly in
	// dev instead of minting a completed £0 payment that real Square would
	// never accept (finding 2).
	if body.AmountMoney.Amount <= 0 {
		return nil, &squareAPIError{
			Code:       "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			Field:      "amount_money",
			Detail:     "The payment amount must be greater than zero",
			StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
			err:        errors.New("square: payment amount must be positive (amount_money is required)"),
		}
	}
	// Square requires customer_id when charging a card-on-file (ccof:) token.
	// The mock enforces the same rule so dev parity catches the production bug
	// where a saved-card charge is sent without the customer's Square customer
	// id (real Square rejects it with a 400 MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER —
	// category INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR — because customer_id is required for a
	// card-on-file source).
	if strings.HasPrefix(req.SourceID, "ccof:") && req.CustomerID == "" {
		return nil, &squareAPIError{
			Code:       "MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER",
			Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			Field:      "customer_id",
			Detail:     "customer_id required for card-on-file source",
			StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
			err:        errors.New("square: customer_id required for card-on-file source"),
		}
	}
	// Square's idempotency-key limit for POST /v2/payments is 45 characters
	// (64 only for /v2/terminals/checkouts) — MaxIdempotencyKeyLength
	// (square_http_client.go), the single source the payments package also
	// aliases. Real Square rejects an oversized key with a 400
	// VALUE_TOO_LONG; the mock mirrors the rejection with the same structured
	// error so dev parity catches over-length keys (the real client always
	// derives ≤45-char keys, so this only fires on a caller bug).
	if len(body.IdempotencyKey) > MaxIdempotencyKeyLength {
		return nil, &squareAPIError{
			Code:       "VALUE_TOO_LONG",
			Detail:     "idempotency_key must be 45 characters or fewer",
			Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
			err:        fmt.Errorf("square: idempotency_key %s is %d chars, exceeds Square's 45-char limit", tokenPrefix(body.IdempotencyKey), len(body.IdempotencyKey)),
		}
	}
	// Do NOT log the full source token — it is a single-use nonce (cnon:) or a
	// card reference (ccof:) that could be replayed. Log only its prefix and
	// length for debugging (S-2).
	sourcePrefix := ""
	if len(body.SourceID) > 8 {
		sourcePrefix = body.SourceID[:8] + "..."
	} else {
		sourcePrefix = body.SourceID
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreatePayment: amount=%d, reference=%s, source=%s", body.AmountMoney.Amount, body.ReferenceID, sourcePrefix)
	mockSleep(1 * time.Second)

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	// Real Square dedups on idempotency key: a retry with the same key returns
	// the original payment rather than creating a second charge. The mock
	// mirrors this so dev/testing behaves like production (also why the tip
	// retry regression test can rely on the mock). Like real Square, the dedup
	// is BODY-AWARE: a retained key reused with a DIFFERENT source_id is
	// rejected with IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED (the same error ReplayPaymentByKey
	// returns for a source mismatch), never silently satisfied — so the
	// gift-card same-key retry (which refreshes square_source_id with a fresh
	// cnon on pending-reuse) surfaces the real prod rejection in dev instead of
	// succeeding where prod would strand the row pending for the sweep.
	if body.IdempotencyKey != "" {
		if existing, ok := m.paymentByKey[body.IdempotencyKey]; ok {
			if storedSource, hasSource := m.paymentSource[body.IdempotencyKey]; hasSource && storedSource != "" && storedSource != body.SourceID {
				log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreatePayment IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED: key=%s reused with a different source (%s vs %s)", body.IdempotencyKey, tokenPrefix(body.SourceID), tokenPrefix(storedSource))
				return nil, keyReuseError(body.IdempotencyKey)
			}
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreatePayment dedup hit: key=%s → id=%s", body.IdempotencyKey, existing.ID)
			return existing, nil
		}
	}

	// Mirror Square's SCA enforcement on NEW-CARD charges (opt-in toggle, off
	// by default): a cnon: charge without 3DS/SCA verification is rejected
	// with a structured 400 CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED — the buyer
	// must re-verify and re-tokenize, NOT retry the same request (the code is
	// in definitivePaymentCodes). A present verification token (e.g.
	// verify_mock_...) satisfies the gate exactly as production accepts a
	// Square-issued verification_token on the CreatePayment body. EXEMPTION: a
	// cnon: source carrying customer_id is the CURRENT saved-card SCA
	// contract's tokenize-result (card.tokenize(verificationDetails, cardId)
	// returns a one-time cnon:-style token sent as source_id with the card's
	// customer_id) — that token only exists because the buyer completed issuer
	// verification, so it IS the SCA proof and is not subject to this
	// new-card verification-token requirement (the saved-card gate below is
	// its authority: it accepts a GENUINE cnon:sca-... tokenize-result and
	// rejects a RAW card.tokenize() nonce in the same slot, money-F2).
	if m.SimulateVerificationRequired && strings.HasPrefix(body.SourceID, "cnon:") {
		switch {
		case body.CustomerID != "":
			// Saved-card tokenize-result — SCA already satisfied by the token
			// (the saved-card gate below validates it is a GENUINE one).
		case body.VerificationToken == "":
			return nil, &squareAPIError{
				Code:       "CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED",
				Category:   "PAYMENT_METHOD_ERROR",
				Detail:     "card requires buyer verification (3DS/SCA); supply a verification token",
				// Square's documented wire status for verification-required is
				// 402 Payment Required, not 400 — the mock must match the WIRE
				// (the handler's code-keyed classification is unchanged, and
				// chargeFailureStatus maps any definitive 4xx to 402 anyway).
				StatusCode: http.StatusPaymentRequired,
				err:        errors.New("square: card requires buyer verification — verification_token required for a new-card (cnon:) charge"),
			}
		default:
			if err := m.resolveVerificationToken(body.VerificationToken, body.SourceID, body.AmountMoney.Amount, false); err != nil {
				return nil, err
			}
		}
	}

	// Mirror Square's SCA enforcement on SAVED-CARD charges — the SCA-primary
	// saved-card posture (opt-in toggle, off by default; placement AFTER the
	// customer_id gate above so a ccof charge without a customer is still
	// MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER, never verification-required). A charge is a
	// saved-card charge in one of two wire shapes:
	//   (a) CURRENT contract: source_id is a fresh SCA tokenize-result (a
	//       one-time cnon:-style token from card.tokenize(verificationDetails,
	//       cardId)) sent with the saved card's customer_id. The token only
	//       exists after the buyer completed issuer verification, so it IS the
	//       SCA proof — the charge is accepted without any verification_token.
	//       The mock distinguishes a genuine tokenize-result (cnon:sca-...) from
	//       a RAW card.tokenize() nonce: real Square rejects an unverified nonce
	//       as a card-on-file source (money-F2), so the mock does too.
	//   (b) LEGACY verifyBuyer() contract (backward-compat): source_id is the
	//       stored ccof: card id carrying a verification_token, resolved
	//       against the pending-challenge ledger below.
	//   (c) NEITHER (a ccof: charge with no verification token): SCA is
	//       demanded — the charge is rejected with the structured 400
	//       CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED and a pending buyer-verification
	//       challenge is recorded for the card, exactly as before.
	// Grandfathered cards (GrandfatherSavedCard) bypass the gate.
	isSavedCardCharge := strings.HasPrefix(body.SourceID, "ccof:") ||
		(strings.HasPrefix(body.SourceID, "cnon:") && body.CustomerID != "")
	if m.SimulateSavedCardVerificationRequired && isSavedCardCharge {
		switch {
		case strings.HasPrefix(body.SourceID, "cnon:"):
			if !isSCATokenizeResultSource(body.SourceID) {
				// A RAW card.tokenize() nonce in the tokenize-result slot.
				// Real Square rejects this shape: only a
				// tokenizeWithVerification RESULT is a valid card-on-file
				// charge source — a plain nonce (new-card flow) cannot stand
				// in for buyer verification. The handler treats any non-empty
				// new_card_token + saved-card ref as an SCA tokenize-result
				// (skipping the 2FA and consent gates), so the mock MUST
				// reject the forged source here (money-F2) or the unverified
				// charge would sail through in dev where Square 400s it. The
				// buyer must complete issuer verification to mint a genuine
				// sca-... tokenize-result.
				return nil, &squareAPIError{
					Code:       "CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED",
					Category:   "PAYMENT_METHOD_ERROR",
					Detail:     "unverified card nonce cannot be used as a saved-card (card-on-file) charge source; complete buyer verification (tokenizeWithVerification) first",
					// 402 on the wire, matching Square's documented status for
					// verification-required.
					StatusCode: http.StatusPaymentRequired,
					err:        fmt.Errorf("square: unverified cnon nonce %s cannot be used as a saved-card (card-on-file) charge source — a genuine tokenizeWithVerification result is required", tokenPrefix(body.SourceID)),
				}
			}
			// (a) genuine tokenize-result — the token IS the buyer verification.
			// The mock validates the deterministic binding the dev frontend
			// encodes into the token (cnon:sca-<prefix>_<amount>_ok|_deny): the
			// embedded amount must match the charge, the prefix must bind to a
			// card the mock knows, and a _deny outcome is refused. An arbitrary
			// cnon:sca-... string that does not prove verification for THIS
			// charge is rejected exactly like real Square's SCA enforcement.
			if err := m.validateSCATokenizeResult(body.SourceID, body.AmountMoney.Amount); err != nil {
				return nil, err
			}
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreatePayment saved-card SCA satisfied by tokenize-result: source %s (no verification_token needed)", tokenPrefix(body.SourceID))
		case body.VerificationToken == "":
			if m.grandfatheredCards[body.SourceID] {
				log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreatePayment saved-card SCA gate bypassed: source %s is grandfathered", tokenPrefix(body.SourceID))
			} else {
				if m.ChallengeResult == "auto" {
					// "auto" config: the banking-app challenge resolves itself
					// as approved, so the next tokenized retry succeeds without
					// an explicit ApprovePendingVerification call.
					m.pendingChallenges[body.SourceID] = &pendingChallenge{outcome: "approved"}
				} else {
					m.pendingChallenges[body.SourceID] = &pendingChallenge{outcome: ""}
				}
				log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreatePayment saved-card SCA gate: source %s rejected without a verification token", tokenPrefix(body.SourceID))
				return nil, &squareAPIError{
					Code:       "CARD_DECLINED_VERIFICATION_REQUIRED",
					Category:   "PAYMENT_METHOD_ERROR",
					Detail:     "saved card requires buyer verification (3DS/SCA); supply a verification token",
					// 402 on the wire, matching Square's documented status for
					// verification-required.
					StatusCode: http.StatusPaymentRequired,
					err:        errors.New("square: saved card requires buyer verification — verification_token required for a card-on-file (ccof:) charge"),
				}
			}
		default:
			if err := m.resolveVerificationToken(body.VerificationToken, body.SourceID, body.AmountMoney.Amount, true); err != nil {
				return nil, err
			}
		}
	}

	// Mirror Square's single-use card nonces: when SimulateSourceUsed is set,
	// a cnon: nonce can only be charged once on this mock instance. Square
	// consumes a nonce when it is used to create a payment, so reusing it
	// under a DIFFERENT idempotency key is rejected with CARD_TOKEN_USED (the
	// CreatePayment code for a used source) — a same-key retry already deduped
	// above and never reaches here. The consumption is OFF by default: the
	// handler integration suite shares ONE mock instance across parallel tests
	// (testmain_test.go assigns a single square.NewDevClient() to the package
	// global) and reuses "cnon:test-card"-style tokens across tests, so
	// default-on consumption would break those tests. Tests that need the
	// single-use simulation flip the toggle on.
	if strings.HasPrefix(body.SourceID, "cnon:") && m.SimulateSourceUsed {
		if m.usedSources[body.SourceID] {
			return nil, &squareAPIError{
				Code:       "CARD_TOKEN_USED",
				Category:   "PAYMENT_METHOD_ERROR",
				Detail:     "The card nonce can no longer be used because it has been used to create a payment",
				StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
				err:        fmt.Errorf("square: card nonce %s has already been used to create a payment", tokenPrefix(body.SourceID)),
			}
		}
		m.usedSources[body.SourceID] = true
	}

	now := clock.Now().UTC()

	status := "COMPLETED"
	if body.Autocomplete != nil && !*body.Autocomplete {
		status = "APPROVED"
	}
	if m.ForcePaymentStatus != "" {
		// Drive the "Square returned 200 with a non-terminal payment" prod
		// scenario: the payment comes back with a non-default status and nil
		// error, so a status-blind caller (records 'completed' on nil error
		// alone) is exposed as a regression.
		status = m.ForcePaymentStatus
	}

	amount := body.AmountMoney.Amount
	tipAmount := int64(0)
	if body.TipMoney != nil {
		tipAmount = body.TipMoney.Amount
		amount += tipAmount
	}

	cardBrand, cardLast4 := detectCardInfo(body.SourceID)

	// Entry method: ON_FILE for card-on-file tokens, KEYED for nonces
	entryMethod := "KEYED"
	if len(body.SourceID) >= 5 && body.SourceID[:5] == "ccof:" {
		entryMethod = "ON_FILE"
	}

	paymentID := fmt.Sprintf("pay_mock_%d", now.UnixNano())
	// Sign-convention parity (finding A): Square reports processing_fee amounts
	// as NEGATIVE on the wire, and paymentFromSquare negates them so
	// PaymentResult.Fees is POSITIVE — the value handlers store as p.fees. The
	// mock fabricates the same positive magnitude directly: online rate 1.4% +
	// 25p (amount*14/1000+25). Mock and real client must agree on the sign;
	// see TestProcessingFeeSign_Parity_MockAndRealClientAgree.
	fees := amount*14/1000 + 25 // online rate: 1.4% + 25p

	locationID := body.LocationID

	expMonth := 12
	expYear := 2030

	result := &PaymentResult{
		ID:              paymentID,
		Status:          status,
		Amount:          amount,
		CardBrand:       cardBrand,
		CardLast4:       cardLast4,
		CardFingerprint: fmt.Sprintf("sqfp_mock_%d", now.UnixNano()),
		ExpMonth:        &expMonth,
		ExpYear:         &expYear,
		EntryMethod:     entryMethod,
		CVVStatus:       "CVV_ACCEPTED",
		AVSStatus:       "AVS_ACCEPTED",
		TipAmount:       tipAmount,
		ReceiptURL:      "https://squareup.com/receipt/" + paymentID,
		ReceiptNumber:   fmt.Sprintf("RCPT_mock_%d", now.UnixNano()),
		SquarePayID:     paymentID,
		Fees:            fees,
		BuyerEmail:      body.BuyerEmailAddress,
		CustomerID:      body.CustomerID,
		LocationID:      locationID,
		CreatedAt:       now.Format(time.RFC3339),
		UpdatedAt:       now.Format(time.RFC3339),
		ReferenceID:     body.ReferenceID,
	}
	m.payments[paymentID] = result
	// SquarePayID is the same ID as the payment (paymentFromSquare sets
	// SquarePayID = sq.ID), so the lookup map is keyed identically to the real
	// client — reconcile/sweep code that resolves a stored square_payment_id
	// via GetPayment behaves the same in mock and prod.
	m.payments[result.SquarePayID] = result
	if body.IdempotencyKey != "" {
		m.paymentByKey[body.IdempotencyKey] = result
		m.paymentSource[body.IdempotencyKey] = body.SourceID
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Payment created: id=%s, status=%s, amount=%d, fees=%d", paymentID, status, amount, fees)
	if m.FailAfterCommit {
		// The charge is already committed above (payment + key + source are in
		// the ledgers exactly like a successful charge) — now simulate the lost
		// response: the caller sees a 5xx-style error while Square holds the
		// payment under the key. A same-key + same-source retry dedups to the
		// committed payment instead of charging twice, exactly like prod.
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] FailAfterCommit: payment %s committed under key=%s but returning simulated 503 (response lost)", paymentID, body.IdempotencyKey)
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("square: charge %s committed but response lost (simulated HTTP 503) — retry with the same idempotency key to receive the committed payment", paymentID)
	}
	return result, nil
}

func (m *MockClient) CreateCheckout(ctx context.Context, req CreateCheckoutReq) (*CheckoutResult, error) {
	if m.FailCreateCheckout {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("mock: checkout creation failed (simulated failure)")
	}
	// Real Square's TerminalCheckout API REQUIRES device_options.device_id: a
	// checkout with an empty device id is rejected with a 400. The real client
	// resolves the per-request device ID with an env fallback
	// (SQUARE_TERMINAL_DEVICE_ID, square_http_client.go:516); the mock mirrors
	// the SAME resolution and rejects when neither is set — so a missing
	// terminal misconfiguration is caught in dev instead of silently
	// "succeeding" where prod 400s.
	deviceID := req.DeviceID
	if deviceID == "" {
		deviceID = os.Getenv("SQUARE_TERMINAL_DEVICE_ID")
	}
	if deviceID == "" {
		return nil, &squareAPIError{
			Code:       "MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER",
			Detail:     "device_options.device_id is required to create a terminal checkout",
			Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			Field:      "device_options.device_id",
			StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
			err:        errors.New("square: device_options.device_id is required for a terminal checkout (set SQUARE_TERMINAL_DEVICE_ID or pass DeviceID)"),
		}
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreateCheckout: amount=%d, allowTipping=%v, reference=%s", req.Amount, req.AllowTipping, req.ReferenceID)

	now := clock.Now().UTC()
	checkoutID := fmt.Sprintf("chk_mock_%d", now.UnixNano())

	status := "PENDING"
	if m.ForceCheckoutState != "" {
		status = m.ForceCheckoutState
	}

	result := &CheckoutResult{
		ID:          checkoutID,
		Status:      status,
		AmountMoney: req.Amount,
		Currency:    req.Currency,
		ReferenceID: req.ReferenceID,
		Note:        req.Note,
		CreatedAt:   now.Format(time.RFC3339),
		UpdatedAt:   now.Format(time.RFC3339),
		Deadline:    "PT5M", // deadline_duration wire format: RFC 3339 duration, not a timestamp
	}

	m.mu.Lock()
	m.checkouts[checkoutID] = result
	m.mu.Unlock()

	// Copy the result before spawning the goroutine to avoid data races.
	// The caller gets this copy; the goroutine modifies the map-stored original.
	resultCopy := *result

	// A forced checkout state must persist (the sweep's intermediate-state
	// paths need a stable IN_PROGRESS / CANCEL_REQUESTED / CANCELED checkout),
	// so the auto-complete goroutine is suppressed while ForceCheckoutState is
	// set — exactly like HoldCheckouts.
	if !m.HoldCheckouts && m.ForceCheckoutState == "" {
		go func() {
			defer func() {
				if r := recover(); r != nil {
					log.Printf("Panic recovered in Square mock payment processing: %v", r)
				}
			}()
			mockSleep(3 * time.Second)

			m.mu.Lock()
			defer m.mu.Unlock()

			payNow := clock.Now().UTC()
			paymentID := fmt.Sprintf("pay_mock_%d", payNow.UnixNano())
			amount := req.Amount
			tipAmount := int64(0)
			// Real Square does NOT add a tip to the checkout amount when
			// AllowTipping is true — it only enables a tip prompt on the
			// Terminal. The frontend already embeds any tip in req.Amount, so
			// the mock must charge exactly req.Amount too (a fixed +500p here
			// double-counted the tip the customer actually agreed to).
			fees := amount * 175 / 10000 // in-person rate: 1.75%

			expMonth := 12
			expYear := 2030

			paymentResult := &PaymentResult{
				ID:              paymentID,
				Status:          "COMPLETED",
				Amount:          amount,
				CardBrand:       "VISA",
				CardLast4:       "4242",
				CardFingerprint: fmt.Sprintf("sqfp_mock_%d", payNow.UnixNano()),
				ExpMonth:        &expMonth,
				ExpYear:         &expYear,
				EntryMethod:     "EMV",
				CVVStatus:       "CVV_ACCEPTED",
				AVSStatus:       "AVS_ACCEPTED",
				TipAmount:       tipAmount,
				ReceiptURL:      "https://squareup.com/receipt/" + paymentID,
				ReceiptNumber:   fmt.Sprintf("RCPT_mock_%d", payNow.UnixNano()),
				SquarePayID:     paymentID,
				Fees:            fees,
				CustomerID:      req.CustomerID,
				LocationID:      "L_MOCK",
				CreatedAt:       payNow.Format(time.RFC3339),
				UpdatedAt:       payNow.Format(time.RFC3339),
				ReferenceID:     req.ReferenceID,
			}
			m.completed[checkoutID] = paymentResult
			// Real Square registers the terminal payment under its own ID:
			// GET /v2/payments/{id} succeeds on a completed terminal
			// checkout's payment in prod, but failed in dev because the
			// payment was never added to m.payments (finding I). Mirror prod
			// by registering it under both the ID and SquarePayID keys, exactly
			// like CreatePayment, so the reconcile/sweep GetPayment path
			// behaves identically.
			m.payments[paymentID] = paymentResult
			m.payments[paymentResult.SquarePayID] = paymentResult
			m.checkouts[checkoutID].Status = "COMPLETED"
			m.checkouts[checkoutID].UpdatedAt = payNow.Format(time.RFC3339)
			m.checkouts[checkoutID].PaymentIDs = []string{paymentID}
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Checkout completed: id=%s, amount=%d, tip=%d", checkoutID, amount, tipAmount)
		}()
	}

	return &resultCopy, nil
}

func (m *MockClient) GetCheckout(ctx context.Context, checkoutID string) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] GetCheckout: id=%s", checkoutID)

	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()

	checkout, ok := m.checkouts[checkoutID]
	if !ok {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("checkout not found: %s", checkoutID)
	}

	// Mirror the real client's GetCheckout state machine
	// (getCheckoutHTTPWithClient): PENDING / IN_PROGRESS / CANCEL_REQUESTED are
	// all still-live checkout states → ErrCheckoutPending; any other
	// non-COMPLETED status (CANCELED, FAILED, expired) surfaces a plain
	// "is <status> (not COMPLETED)" error so the sweep's
	// isTerminalCheckoutError / isCheckoutDefinitivelyDead classification runs
	// identically in mock and prod.
	switch checkout.Status {
	case "PENDING", "IN_PROGRESS", "CANCEL_REQUESTED":
		return nil, ErrCheckoutPending
	case "COMPLETED":
		result, ok := m.completed[checkoutID]
		if !ok {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("checkout result not found: %s", checkoutID)
		}
		return result, nil
	default:
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("square: checkout %s is %s (not COMPLETED)", checkoutID, checkout.Status)
	}
}

func (m *MockClient) GetPayment(ctx context.Context, paymentID string) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] GetPayment: id=%s", paymentID)

	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()

	payment, ok := m.payments[paymentID]
	if !ok {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("payment not found: %s", paymentID)
	}
	return payment, nil
}

// ReplayPaymentByKey mirrors the real client's IDENTICAL-body replay-by-key
// reconcile (POST /v2/payments with the full stored request snapshot): a
// retained key with the matching stored source returns the ORIGINAL payment
// (never a second charge); a retained key with a DIFFERENT source returns a
// structured 400 IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED — exactly what Square returns when an
// idempotency key is reused with a different request body (the stored source
// must never differ from the original, so the sweep treats it as ambiguous);
// an unknown key makes Square attempt a real charge with the stored source: a
// still-valid ccof: saved-card token CHARGES successfully (returning a new
// COMPLETED payment the sweep rescues), while a spent/expired cnon: nonce is
// rejected with a 4xx — surfaced as ErrReplayKeyNotRetained.
func (m *MockClient) ReplayPaymentByKey(ctx context.Context, snapshotJSON []byte) (*PaymentResult, error) {
	var req CreatePaymentReq
	if err := json.Unmarshal(snapshotJSON, &req); err != nil {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("square: replay-by-key cannot parse stored request snapshot: %w", err)
	}
	// Mirror prod's replay-by-key sanity validation
	// (replayPaymentByKeyHTTPWithClient, square_http_client.go): a snapshot
	// missing source_id or idempotency_key is CORRUPT — never replay it as if
	// it could succeed. Prod returns a plain (ambiguous) error here, so the
	// sweep leaves the row PENDING for manual reconciliation; the mock must NOT
	// answer ErrReplayKeyNotRetained (which the sweep treats as "the charge
	// provably never happened" and definitively fails the row) — that is the
	// OPPOSITE money decision on a snapshot we cannot trust.
	if req.SourceID == "" || req.IdempotencyKey == "" {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("square: replay-by-key snapshot missing source_id/idempotency_key")
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] ReplayPaymentByKey: key=%s, source=%s", req.IdempotencyKey, tokenPrefix(req.SourceID))

	m.mu.RLock()
	existing, ok := m.paymentByKey[req.IdempotencyKey]
	storedSource := m.paymentSource[req.IdempotencyKey]
	m.mu.RUnlock()

	if ok {
		if storedSource != "" && storedSource != req.SourceID {
			// Same key, different body — Square's documented IDEMPOTENCY_KEY_REUSED
			// rejection. A data bug (the stored source differs from the original
			// charge), NOT proof the charge never happened.
			return nil, keyReuseError(req.IdempotencyKey)
		}
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] ReplayPaymentByKey dedup hit: key=%s → id=%s", req.IdempotencyKey, existing.ID)
		return existing, nil
	}

	// Unknown key — mirror real Square: it attempts a real charge with the
	// stored source. A still-valid ccof: saved-card token charges successfully
	// (the sweep then rescues the row); a spent/expired cnon: nonce (or any
	// unchargeable source) is rejected with a definitive 4xx.
	if strings.HasPrefix(req.SourceID, "ccof:") {
		m.mu.RLock()
		_, cardOK := m.cardByToken[req.SourceID]
		m.mu.RUnlock()
		if !cardOK {
			// The saved card is not in the mock ledger — mirror real Square
			// rejecting a deleted/disabled card with a definitive 4xx.
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: Square has no saved card %s to charge", ErrReplayKeyNotRetained, tokenPrefix(req.SourceID))
		}
		if req.Currency == "" {
			req.Currency = gbpCurrency
		}
		pr, err := m.CreatePayment(ctx, req)
		if err != nil {
			if replayErrorProvesNoCharge(err) {
				return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %v", ErrReplayKeyNotRetained, err)
			}
			return nil, err
		}
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] ReplayPaymentByKey charged saved card for unknown key: key=%s → id=%s", req.IdempotencyKey, pr.ID)
		return pr, nil
	}
	return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: Square has no payment under idempotency key (HTTP 400: source rejected)", ErrReplayKeyNotRetained)
}

func (m *MockClient) RefundPayment(ctx context.Context, req RefundPaymentReq) (*RefundResult, error) {
	if m.ShouldFail {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: refund declined (simulated failure)", ErrRefundDeclined)
	}
	if m.FailRefundCode != "" {
		switch m.FailRefundCode {
		case "PAYMENT_ALREADY_REFUNDED", "REFUND_ALREADY_PENDING":
			// Both codes mean money is in flight or has already moved at
			// Square — the same classification the real client applies
			// (square_http_client.go:687), so the concurrent-refund dedup path
			// is exercisable in dev.
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s (simulated)", ErrRefundAlreadyProcessed, m.FailRefundCode)
		default:
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %s (simulated failure)", ErrRefundDeclined, m.FailRefundCode)
		}
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] RefundPayment: payment=%s, amount=%d", req.PaymentID, req.Amount)
	mockSleep(1 * time.Second)

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	// Real Square dedups on idempotency key: a retry with the same key returns
	// the original refund rather than issuing a second refund. The mock mirrors
	// this so dev/testing behaves like production (and the pending-refund
	// resume path can rely on it).
	if req.IdempotencyKey != "" {
		if existing, ok := m.refundByKey[req.IdempotencyKey]; ok {
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] RefundPayment dedup hit: key=%s → id=%s", req.IdempotencyKey, existing.ID)
			return existing, nil
		}
	}

	now := clock.Now().UTC()
	refundID := fmt.Sprintf("ref_mock_%d", now.UnixNano())

	// Square's RefundPayment requires amount_money — a missing or zero amount
	// is rejected (400 REFUND_AMOUNT_INVALID, category INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR),
	// never treated as a "full refund" shortcut. The mock mirrors this so a
	// missing-amount bug can't be masked in dev (the real DB also has a CHECK
	// amount > 0, so a £0 refund must fail rather than silently record nothing).
	if req.Amount <= 0 {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("square: refund amount must be positive (amount_money is required)")
	}

	// Reject refunds for a mock-artifact payment ID that was never created.
	// The mock mints payment IDs as "pay_mock_<n>"; a refund targeting such an
	// ID that is NOT in the ledger is a provable bug (that charge never went
	// through this mock) and real Square answers 404 NOT_FOUND. Non-"pay_mock_"
	// IDs (e.g. the DB-fixture square_payment_id values handler tests seed
	// refunds against) are payments that exist outside the mock's ledger —
	// exactly as they would at real Square — so they take the lenient path.
	if strings.HasPrefix(req.PaymentID, "pay_mock_") {
		if _, known := m.payments[req.PaymentID]; !known {
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] RefundPayment REJECTED: payment %s not found (NOT_FOUND)", req.PaymentID)
			return nil, &squareAPIError{
				Code:       "NOT_FOUND",
				Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
				Detail:     "The payment_id in the refund request does not exist",
				StatusCode: http.StatusNotFound,
				err:        fmt.Errorf("square: no payment %s exists to refund", tokenPrefix(req.PaymentID)),
			}
		}
	}

	amount := req.Amount

	// Known payments get the real Square over-refund rejection: refunding more
	// than the remaining balance answers 400 REFUND_AMOUNT_INVALID. Square
	// returns that SAME code for an already-refunded payment, so — exactly like
	// the real client (refundPaymentHTTPWithClient's REFUND_AMOUNT_INVALID
	// reconciliation via paymentRefundedExactlyWithClient) — the mock
	// reconciles: an existing COMPLETED refund for the EXACT requested amount
	// (that money provably already moved) → ErrRefundAlreadyProcessed; anything
	// else → the amount is genuinely invalid → ErrRefundDeclined. A different
	// amount is NEVER AlreadyProcessed: only an exact-amount refund covers the
	// requested money, so an over-refund on top of a PARTIAL prior refund
	// surfaces as ErrRefundDeclined (the row is marked failed, alerting the
	// over-refund guard bug) instead of being resolved 'completed' and hiding
	// it.
	if payment, ok := m.payments[req.PaymentID]; ok {
		remaining := payment.Amount
		for _, r := range m.refunds {
			if r.PaymentID == req.PaymentID && (r.Status == "COMPLETED" || r.Status == "APPROVED" || r.Status == "PENDING") {
				remaining -= r.Amount
			}
		}
		if req.Amount > remaining {
			apiErr := &squareAPIError{
				Code:       "REFUND_AMOUNT_INVALID",
				Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
				Detail:     "The refunded amount is more than the remaining balance",
				StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
				err:        fmt.Errorf("square: refund amount %d exceeds remaining balance %d for payment %s", req.Amount, remaining, req.PaymentID),
			}
			if m.refundExistsExact(req.PaymentID, req.Amount) {
				return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %v", ErrRefundAlreadyProcessed, apiErr)
			}
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("%w: %v", ErrRefundDeclined, apiErr)
		}
	} else {
		// Payment not in mock map — this happens when integration tests create
		// payments via DB fixture with a square_payment_id, bypassing the mock.
		// Process the refund without full payment data (the balance is unknown,
		// so no over-refund check applies).
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] RefundPayment: payment %s not in mock map — proceeding without full payment data", req.PaymentID)
	}

	locationID := req.LocationID
	if locationID == "" {
		locationID = "L_MOCK"
	}

	status := "COMPLETED"
	if m.ForceRefundPending {
		status = "PENDING"
	}

	result := &RefundResult{
		ID:         refundID,
		Status:     status,
		Amount:     amount,
		PaymentID:  req.PaymentID,
		LocationID: locationID,
		Reason:     req.Reason,
		CreatedAt:  now.Format(time.RFC3339),
	}
	m.refunds[refundID] = result
	if req.IdempotencyKey != "" {
		m.refundByKey[req.IdempotencyKey] = result
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Refund completed: id=%s, payment=%s, amount=%d", refundID, req.PaymentID, amount)
	return result, nil
}

// RefundKeyCount returns the number of distinct idempotency keys this mock has
// recorded refunds against (the refundByKey dedup map). Test accessor for
// asserting that same-key retries issue exactly ONE Square refund, never a
// second.
func (m *MockClient) RefundKeyCount() int {
	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()
	return len(m.refundByKey)
}

// refundExistsExact reports whether the mock holds a COMPLETED refund for the
// payment in the EXACT amount requested — the same exact-match reconciliation
// the real client runs when Square returns REFUND_AMOUNT_INVALID
// (paymentRefundedExactlyWithClient: status COMPLETED && amount == requested).
// Only an exact-amount COMPLETED refund proves THIS requested money already
// moved; a partial refund does not cover it. Caller holds m.mu (RefundPayment
// holds the write lock).
func (m *MockClient) refundExistsExact(paymentID string, amount int64) bool {
	for _, r := range m.refunds {
		if r.PaymentID == paymentID && r.Status == "COMPLETED" && r.Amount == amount {
			return true
		}
	}
	return false
}

// PaymentWasRefunded mirrors the real client's reconciliation source: true when
// any refund with status COMPLETED, APPROVED, or PENDING exists for the payment
// (FAILED/REJECTED refunds never moved money and are ignored). Shares the exact
// status set the real client's paymentWasRefundedWithClient uses so handler
// reconciliation behaves identically in dev/mock and production. TEST-ONLY on
// the SquareClient interface (no production callers — reconciliation uses the
// package-level paymentRefundedExactlyWithClient); kept so this mock satisfies
// the interface and its refund-status parity tests can exercise the set.
func (m *MockClient) PaymentWasRefunded(ctx context.Context, paymentID string) (bool, error) {
	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()
	for _, r := range m.refunds {
		if r.PaymentID != paymentID {
			continue
		}
		switch r.Status {
		case "COMPLETED", "APPROVED", "PENDING":
			return true, nil
		}
	}
	return false, nil
}

// UsedSources returns the card sources consumed by CreateCardOnFile while
// SimulateSourceUsed is enabled. Test accessor for asserting that a reused
// source is rejected with SOURCE_USED after a previous save.
func (m *MockClient) UsedSources() []string {
	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()
	out := make([]string, 0, len(m.usedSources))
	for src := range m.usedSources {
		out = append(out, src)
	}
	return out
}

// GrandfatherSavedCard marks a ccof: token exempt from the saved-card
// verification gate (SimulateSavedCardVerificationRequired), so that card
// charges without a verification token — mirroring a card Square has already
// verified or holds a standing SCA exemption for.
func (m *MockClient) GrandfatherSavedCard(ccofToken string) {
	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()
	m.grandfatheredCards[ccofToken] = true
}

// ApprovePendingVerification marks the recorded buyer-verification challenge
// for a saved card as approved (creating it if the gate never recorded one), so
// a subsequent tokenized charge of that card succeeds.
func (m *MockClient) ApprovePendingVerification(ccofToken string) {
	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()
	if ch, ok := m.pendingChallenges[ccofToken]; ok {
		ch.outcome = "approved"
		return
	}
	m.pendingChallenges[ccofToken] = &pendingChallenge{outcome: "approved"}
}

// DenyPendingVerification marks the recorded buyer-verification challenge for
// a saved card as denied, so a subsequent tokenized charge of that card is
// rejected with VERIFICATION_TOKEN_INVALID (the token is consumed).
func (m *MockClient) DenyPendingVerification(ccofToken string) {
	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()
	if ch, ok := m.pendingChallenges[ccofToken]; ok {
		ch.outcome = "denied"
		return
	}
	m.pendingChallenges[ccofToken] = &pendingChallenge{outcome: "denied"}
}

func (m *MockClient) CreateCardOnFile(ctx context.Context, userID, cardToken, customerID string) (*CardOnFile, error) {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreateCardOnFile: user=%s", userID)

	// Match the real Square API: source_id must be a token (cnon:xxx nonce or
	// ccof:xxx card ID). Raw PANs are rejected exactly as Square would, so the
	// mock behaves identically to production. The legacy verify_mock_* shape is
	// rejected explicitly — real Square never accepts it as a source.
	if strings.HasPrefix(cardToken, "verify_mock_") {
		return nil, legacyVerifyMockSourceError(cardToken)
	}
	if !isTokenLikeMock(cardToken) {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid source_id: %s — use a card nonce (cnon:xxx) or card ID (ccof:xxx)", tokenPrefix(cardToken))
	}

	// Square's POST /v2/cards rejects a card without card.customer_id at
	// runtime (confirmed by Square's own SDK maintainer). The production client
	// omits an empty customer_id via omitempty and every production caller
	// provisions a Square customer first, so the gate is enforced upstream — the
	// mock must mirror it (same structured MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER as the
	// ccof: CreatePayment gate above) so sandbox/dev tests exercise the same
	// rejection.
	if customerID == "" {
		return nil, &squareAPIError{
			Code:       "MISSING_REQUIRED_PARAMETER",
			Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			Field:      "card.customer_id",
			Detail:     "customer_id is required to create a card on file",
			StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
			err:        errors.New("square: customer_id is required to create a card on file"),
		}
	}

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	if m.SimulateSourceUsed && m.usedSources[cardToken] {
		// Real Square consumes a cnon: nonce on card creation — reusing it to
		// create another card is rejected with SOURCE_USED (the CreateCard
		// error; CARD_TOKEN_USED is a CreatePayment code and would be wrong
		// here). The mock mirrors that structured 400 rejection (opt-in, see
		// the struct doc).
		return nil, &squareAPIError{
			Code:       "SOURCE_USED",
			Detail:     "The provided source id was already used to create a card",
			Category:   "INVALID_REQUEST_ERROR",
			StatusCode: http.StatusBadRequest,
			err:        fmt.Errorf("square: card source %s has already been used to create a card", tokenPrefix(cardToken)),
		}
	}

	if m.cards[userID] == nil {
		m.cards[userID] = make(map[string]*CardOnFile)
	}

	now := clock.Now().UTC()
	cardID := fmt.Sprintf("mock_card_%d", now.UnixNano())
	brand, last4 := detectCardInfo(cardToken)
	card := &CardOnFile{
		ID:             cardID,
		// Prefix "ccof:" so the mock's own entry-method detection (and any
		// consumer checking the prefix) sees ON_FILE, matching production where
		// saved-card tokens are "ccof:xxx". An "ccof_mock_" id would silently
		// exercise the KEYED path in tests while prod runs ON_FILE.
		CardID:         fmt.Sprintf("ccof:mock_%d", now.UnixNano()),
		Brand:          brand,
		Last4:          last4,
		ExpMonth:       12,
		ExpYear:        2030,
		Fingerprint:    fmt.Sprintf("sqfp_mock_%d", now.UnixNano()),
		CardholderName: "John Doe",
		ReferenceID:    userID,
		Enabled:        true,
		IsDefault:      len(m.cards[userID]) == 0,
		Version:        1,
		CreatedAt:      now.Format(time.RFC3339),
	}
	m.cards[userID][cardID] = card
	m.cardByToken[card.CardID] = card
	if m.SimulateSourceUsed {
		m.usedSources[cardToken] = true
	}
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Card created: id=%s, brand=%s, last4=%s", cardID, card.Brand, card.Last4)
	return card, nil
}

func (m *MockClient) GetCardsOnFile(ctx context.Context, userID string) ([]CardOnFile, error) {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] GetCardsOnFile: user=%s", userID)

	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()

	userCards, ok := m.cards[userID]
	if !ok {
		return []CardOnFile{}, nil
	}

	var cards []CardOnFile
	for _, card := range userCards {
		// Real Square's List Cards API EXCLUDES disabled cards by default
		// (the client sends no include_disabled param) — a disabled/deleted
		// card disappears from GetCardsOnFile. Mirror that so dev parity
		// matches prod (finding C).
		if !card.Enabled {
			continue
		}
		cards = append(cards, *card)
	}
	return cards, nil
}

func (m *MockClient) DeleteCardOnFile(ctx context.Context, cardID string) error {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] DeleteCardOnFile: id=%s", cardID)

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	// Production callers pass the DB-stored ccof: card reference
	// (CardOnFile.CardID, e.g. "ccof:mock_..."), which the mock must resolve
	// through cardByToken (keyed by the full CardID) so the deletion actually
	// finds and disables the card — previously the mock keyed only by its
	// mock-local ID (mock_card_...) and silently missed every ccof: call.
	if card, ok := m.cardByToken[cardID]; ok {
		card.Enabled = false
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Card disabled: id=%s (user=%s)", tokenPrefix(cardID), tokenPrefix(card.ReferenceID))
		return nil
	}
	// Fallback for the mock-local ID form (mock_card_...) still exercised by
	// this package's own tests — resolve the card through the per-user maps.
	for userID, cards := range m.cards {
		if card, ok := cards[cardID]; ok {
			card.Enabled = false
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Card disabled: id=%s (user=%s)", tokenPrefix(cardID), userID)
			return nil
		}
	}
	return fmt.Errorf("square: card not found: %s", cardID)
}

func (m *MockClient) ListPaymentRefunds(ctx context.Context, paymentID string, beginTime time.Time) ([]RefundResult, error) {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] ListPaymentRefunds: payment=%s, begin=%s", paymentID, beginTime.UTC().Format(time.RFC3339))

	m.mu.RLock()
	defer m.mu.RUnlock()

	out := []RefundResult{}
	for _, r := range m.refunds {
		if r.PaymentID != paymentID {
			continue
		}
		createdAt, err := time.Parse(time.RFC3339, r.CreatedAt)
		if err == nil && createdAt.Before(beginTime) {
			continue
		}
		out = append(out, *r)
	}
	return out, nil
}

// redactedEmail masks a customer email for dev logs (PII, S-2 convention):
// only the first two characters of the local part plus the domain are shown,
// e.g. "ja***@example.com". Malformed addresses fall back to "[redacted]".
func redactedEmail(email string) string {
	at := strings.Index(email, "@")
	if at < 2 || at+1 >= len(email) {
		return "[redacted]"
	}
	return email[:2] + "***@" + email[at+1:]
}

func (m *MockClient) CreateCustomer(ctx context.Context, name, email string) (*CustomerResult, error) {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreateCustomer: name=%s, email=%s", name, redactedEmail(email))

	if email == "" {
		return nil, fmt.Errorf("mock: customer email is required")
	}

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	// Real Square dedups on the idempotency key (derived from the email);
	// the mock mirrors this by deduping on email so a retry returns the
	// original customer rather than creating a duplicate.
	if existing, ok := m.customers[email]; ok {
		log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CreateCustomer dedup hit: email=%s → id=%s", redactedEmail(email), tokenPrefix(existing.ID))
		return existing, nil
	}

	sum := sha256.Sum256([]byte(email))
	customer := &CustomerResult{
		ID:        "cus_mock_" + fmt.Sprintf("%x", sum)[:12],
		Email:     email,
		CreatedAt: clock.Now().UTC().Format(time.RFC3339),
	}
	m.customers[email] = customer
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Customer created: id=%s, email=%s", tokenPrefix(customer.ID), redactedEmail(email))
	return customer, nil
}

func (m *MockClient) DeleteCustomer(ctx context.Context, customerID string) error {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] DeleteCustomer: id=%s", tokenPrefix(customerID))

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	for email, customer := range m.customers {
		if customer.ID == customerID {
			delete(m.customers, email)
			log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] Customer deleted: id=%s", tokenPrefix(customerID))
			return nil
		}
	}
	// Real Square returns 404 / NOT_FOUND for an already-deleted customer —
	// mirror the prod semantics of idempotent re-deletion as a no-op.
	return nil
}

func (m *MockClient) CancelCheckout(ctx context.Context, checkoutID string) error {
	log.Printf("[SQUARE-MOCK] CancelCheckout: id=%s", checkoutID)

	m.mu.Lock()
	defer m.mu.Unlock()

	// Real Square cancels only pending/in-progress checkouts; a completed or
	// missing checkout is a no-op (Square returns 404/NOT_FOUND in prod).
	if checkout, ok := m.checkouts[checkoutID]; ok {
		if checkout.Status == "PENDING" || checkout.Status == "IN_PROGRESS" {
			checkout.Status = "CANCELED"
			checkout.UpdatedAt = clock.Now().UTC().Format(time.RFC3339)
		}
	}
	return nil
}

func realBaseURL(env string) string {
	if env == "production" {
		return squareProductionURL
	}
	return squareSandboxURL
}